thehallsofmonsterhigh

of-another-broken-heart:

All images copyright Mattel. Complete graphic the result of yours truly

This is a color comparison between the sixteen characters currently listed on the Ever After High website as of October 12th, 2014 - comparing official/promotional art, animation appearance, and retail doll photos. 

Color samples correspond left-to-right with images:

  • Left is official/promo sample
  • Center is animation sample
  • Right is doll photo sample 
danareadsbooks

urtube:

beevomitbooboo:

beevomitbooboo:

sixpenceee:

Who remembers the Berenstain Bears? Many people actually remember it as the Berenstein Bears. It’s part of the Mandela theory, or a term that someone is positive something happened although it didn’t. Many attribute these false memories as a glimpse into a parallel universe. (Source)

Ok nonononono fuck no I swear I have these on my shelf and I swear to god they say Berenstein, I am checking right now this cannot be real

WHAT THE FUCJK THEY ALL FUKCING SAY BERENSTAIN THEY DIDN’T SAY THAT WHEN i WAS A CHILD I DON’T UNDERSTAND. THIS CANNOT BE REAL, THIS CANNOT BE A THING

I thought they were Jewish

That isn’t real. I owned all of their books it has to be Berenstein lol

thedollnerd
teatime-with-maddie:

scary-murphy:

sassking-trevor:

scary-murphy:

sailorevermonster:

New Kitty Cheshire and Ginger Breadhouse dolls
from Ever After High Dolls Facebook Page 

oh, umwell i’m glad the pink hair wasn’t for rosabellareserving judgement on kitty

I’m still sad about Kitty losing the blues and browns of her outfit but I’M VERY happy with her doll tbh.
ALSO I WON’T EVEN FUCKING LIE HOW HEAD OVER HEELS IN LOVE I AM WITH GINGER WE HAVE A NEW WOC AND SHE’S GORGEOUS AS FUCK AND SHE HAS GLASSES?????
SIGN ME THE FUCK UP

my concern with ginger is that, like with cedar and her wood texture, people are going to be like, oh, it’s not her skin it’s because she’s a ~cookie~ or whatever. i fully admit she’s totally cute though.kitty i just wish they’d committed a bit more to her smile, making it smirky like it is in the webisodes.

Ginger is, as far as I know, supposed to be the daughter of the witch from Hansel and Gretel (hence the caldron purse), not the daughter of the gingerbread man, so she isn’t a cookie at all and if people start saying that they are just ridiculous.
Also, that just made me realize that she totally has glasses because the witch in the story is basically blind, so that is a pretty awesome detail. I just wish she weren’t more pink in a sea of pink, but I do really like her on her own.

teatime-with-maddie:

scary-murphy:

sassking-trevor:

scary-murphy:

sailorevermonster:

New Kitty Cheshire and Ginger Breadhouse dolls

from Ever After High Dolls Facebook Page 

oh, um

well i’m glad the pink hair wasn’t for rosabella

reserving judgement on kitty

I’m still sad about Kitty losing the blues and browns of her outfit but I’M VERY happy with her doll tbh.

ALSO I WON’T EVEN FUCKING LIE HOW HEAD OVER HEELS IN LOVE I AM WITH GINGER WE HAVE A NEW WOC AND SHE’S GORGEOUS AS FUCK AND SHE HAS GLASSES?????

SIGN ME THE FUCK UP

my concern with ginger is that, like with cedar and her wood texture, people are going to be like, oh, it’s not her skin it’s because she’s a ~cookie~ or whatever. i fully admit she’s totally cute though.

kitty i just wish they’d committed a bit more to her smile, making it smirky like it is in the webisodes.

Ginger is, as far as I know, supposed to be the daughter of the witch from Hansel and Gretel (hence the caldron purse), not the daughter of the gingerbread man, so she isn’t a cookie at all and if people start saying that they are just ridiculous.

Also, that just made me realize that she totally has glasses because the witch in the story is basically blind, so that is a pretty awesome detail. I just wish she weren’t more pink in a sea of pink, but I do really like her on her own.

mycandylove1fan
hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.
The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.
Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 
"We don’t need feminism" 
"Maybe he just worked harder"
"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.

The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.

Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. 
source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 

"We don’t need feminism" 

"Maybe he just worked harder"

"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

strangeparkings

meetaclassybitch:

The first picture is me and my twinbrother when we were 3 years old. The second picture is me on my brother’s funeral. He was 18 years old and killed himself. I don’t care if this ruins your blog. I want you to reblog this and make a statement.

The first picture is worldfamous. Even Kendall Jenner posted it on her instagram account.We were on the news because no one knew that the picture was 15 years old. But people need to realize that life isn’t as pretty as the picture tells us. Life is cruel. Just like our society. And I’ve lost my best friend because of it. Teenagers are suppose to have fun, instead of thinking about killing themselves. 

I hope this will get to Kendall Jenner and she’ll defend my statement. Because no one will probably listen to me… 

strangeparkings
mayra-quijotesca:

trustisforfools:

mrspiritual:

musicalpandas:

gainingconfidencexo:

havocados:

emorenita:

why aren’t these being reblogged more often?i rather see these than “keys in hand”

Fatality

Umm so since I’m stupid could someone kindly explain each step for me like step 3 am i head butting him in the face or the chest? 

I think it depends on the height of the person, but I suppose the head is a more effective target. I hope this helps :)

Step 1: Step back the moment he reaches for you.
Step 2: Duck!
Step 3: Head butt him in the chin. It’s very important that it is the chin and not the chest because it is much more uncomfortable and disorienting to have your teeth bang together especially if it cuts his tongue (which it will if it is in the way). More than likely height won’t matter. He will be leaning forward from the missed attempt at grabbing you.
Step 4: Knee him in the balls.
Step 5: When he doubles over, jab him on his back. I believe at the base of the neck just above the shoulder blades would be best. I’m not an expert, but this seems like the best place, imo.
Step 6: Don’t lose contact. Bring your other hand over and slam your hands against the sides of his heads as hard as possible. Right on the ears is the best place; it is extremely disorienting if done correctly. Then take his head and bring it down on your knee as you bring your knee up. It’s very important that you avoid the nose because if you knee his nose it will definitely break and more than likely the bones will stab his brain killing him, so aim for his mouth instead.
Step 7: Keep your knee up and bring your foot out to kick him over. Personally, I don’t like the image because it looks like she kicked him with her toes. You do not want to do that. Instead kick him with the ball or heel of your foot and put power behind it with a push.
Step 8: He is on the ground. You could probably stop here and he would get the picture, but if you really want to…Your leg is still in the air from the kick. With all your force slam the edge of your your heel on his side. It will be more effective if you lower your body first by bending at the knee of the leg your weight is on. Done right, you can break a rib or two.

reblogging again for that^

Reblogging for the steps in the image and the explanation in the comments. I don’t so much like the explanation on the image proper, but I appreciate the thought behind it (here, have a self-defense thing, it could save you) and so I’m passing it on.

mayra-quijotesca:

trustisforfools:

mrspiritual:

musicalpandas:

gainingconfidencexo:

havocados:

emorenita:

why aren’t these being reblogged more often?
i rather see these than “keys in hand”

Fatality

Umm so since I’m stupid could someone kindly explain each step for me like step 3 am i head butting him in the face or the chest? 

I think it depends on the height of the person, but I suppose the head is a more effective target. I hope this helps :)

Step 1: Step back the moment he reaches for you.

Step 2: Duck!

Step 3: Head butt him in the chin. It’s very important that it is the chin and not the chest because it is much more uncomfortable and disorienting to have your teeth bang together especially if it cuts his tongue (which it will if it is in the way). More than likely height won’t matter. He will be leaning forward from the missed attempt at grabbing you.

Step 4: Knee him in the balls.

Step 5: When he doubles over, jab him on his back. I believe at the base of the neck just above the shoulder blades would be best. I’m not an expert, but this seems like the best place, imo.

Step 6: Don’t lose contact. Bring your other hand over and slam your hands against the sides of his heads as hard as possible. Right on the ears is the best place; it is extremely disorienting if done correctly. Then take his head and bring it down on your knee as you bring your knee up. It’s very important that you avoid the nose because if you knee his nose it will definitely break and more than likely the bones will stab his brain killing him, so aim for his mouth instead.

Step 7: Keep your knee up and bring your foot out to kick him over. Personally, I don’t like the image because it looks like she kicked him with her toes. You do not want to do that. Instead kick him with the ball or heel of your foot and put power behind it with a push.

Step 8: He is on the ground. You could probably stop here and he would get the picture, but if you really want to…Your leg is still in the air from the kick. With all your force slam the edge of your your heel on his side. It will be more effective if you lower your body first by bending at the knee of the leg your weight is on. Done right, you can break a rib or two.

reblogging again for that^

Reblogging for the steps in the image and the explanation in the comments. I don’t so much like the explanation on the image proper, but I appreciate the thought behind it (here, have a self-defense thing, it could save you) and so I’m passing it on.